From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 28 13:17:31 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E62E16A4CE; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 13:17:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from vbook.fbsd.ru (swsoft-mipt-nat.sw.ru [195.214.233.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 462C143D2F; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 13:17:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vova@vbook.fbsd.ru) Received: from vova by vbook.fbsd.ru with local (Exim 4.50 (FreeBSD)) id 1DFu7Q-0004wm-Am; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 17:17:24 +0400 From: Vladimir Grebenschikov To: ticso@cicely.de In-Reply-To: <20050328130451.GB14532@cicely12.cicely.de> References: <30956.1112011996@critter.freebsd.dk> <1112014711.1022.37.camel@localhost> <20050328130451.GB14532@cicely12.cicely.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Organization: SWsoft Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 17:17:24 +0400 Message-Id: <1112015844.1022.44.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Sender: Vladimir Grebenschikov cc: "current@freebsd.org" cc: "Matthew N. Dodd" cc: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org cc: Poul-Henning Kamp cc: Julian Elischer Subject: Re: Reattach/redetect allways connected umass device - is it possible ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: vova@fbsd.ru List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 13:17:31 -0000 =F7 =D0=CE, 28/03/2005 =D7 15:04 +0200, Bernd Walter =D0=C9=DB=C5=D4: > On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 04:58:31PM +0400, Vladimir Grebenschikov wrote: > > ? ??, 28/03/2005 ? 14:13 +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp ?????: > > > In message <20050328114633.GZ14532@cicely12.cicely.de>, Bernd Walter = writes: > > >=20 > > > >> camcontrol detach da0; camcontrol rescan all=20 > > > >> helps, but, it should be much better if it will be issued automati= cally. > > > > > > > >Yes - GEOM seems to ignore media change signals from drives. > > > >I've added PHK to the recipient list - maybe he has an idea about th= is > > > >problem. > > >=20 > > > No, GEOM doesn't ignore any such thing, because as far as I know > > > GEOM doesn't get any such thing to ignore in the first place. > >=20 > > So, let's imagine following situation: > >=20 > > We get SCSI BUS with removable da device. > > device detected as da0 and not mounted. > > Device disconnected from SCSI bus. > > And finally, another device with different geometry connected with same > > SCIS ID. >=20 > This ist not a *media* exchange - this is a *device* and in > this case even a scbus exchange. Ok, so my case is media exchange, not device exchange. How it is supposed to work in this case ?=20 --=20 Vladimir B. Grebenchikov vova@fbsd.ru