From owner-freebsd-questions  Mon Apr 22 15:37:51 1996
Return-Path: owner-questions
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id PAA21192
          for questions-outgoing; Mon, 22 Apr 1996 15:37:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hod.tera.com (hod.tera.com [206.215.142.67])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id PAA21182
          for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 22 Apr 1996 15:37:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from athena.tera.com (athena.tera.com [206.215.142.62]) by hod.tera.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id PAA14015; Mon, 22 Apr 1996 15:35:42 -0700 (PDT)
From: Gary Kline <kline@tera.com>
Received: (from kline@localhost) by athena.tera.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id PAA09313; Mon, 22 Apr 1996 15:36:57 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199604222236.PAA09313@athena.tera.com>
Subject: Re: sendmail.cf problem??
To: mark@seeware.DIALix.oz.au (Mark Hannon)
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 1996 15:36:57 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <Dq704A.MsC@seeware.DIALix.oz.au> from Mark Hannon at "Apr 21, 96 03:24:09 am"
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL11 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

According to Mark Hannon:
> In article <199604101732.KAA05467@athena.tera.com>,
> 	kline@tera.com (Gary Kline) writes:
> >
> >
> >		[[ my sendmail problems ... ]]

> >
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Did anyone ever work out what was going on here??  I just upgraded
> from 2.1.0-RELEASE to -STABLE (with a new sendmail) and I am seeing
> the same problems as described above.  I have reinstalled the 2.1.0
> version of sendmail and everything is OK.  Ideas???
> 
> My sendmail.mc:
> 
> include(`../m4/cf.m4')
> VERSIONID(`@(#)uucpproto.mc	8.3 (Berkeley) 8/21/93')
> OSTYPE(bsd4.4)dnl
> 
> MASQUERADE_AS(seeware.DIALix.oz.au)dnl
> 
> FEATURE(nodns)dnl
> FEATURE(notsticky)dnl	
> 
> MAILER(local)dnl
> MAILER(smtp)dnl
> MAILER(uucp)dnl
> 
> define(`SMART_HOST', uucp-dom:melbourne)
> 
> This has been working for close to a year without problems.
> 
> Rgds/mark
> 

		
		The problems in my configuration turned out to
		be a missing `local' set of several lines.  Not
		sure why/how, other than the sendmail.cf at my
		MX site was upgraded, modified.

		Can any of the sendmail wizards think of any
		reason that upgrading to 2.1 would ruin this
		gent's system?  Mark, can you back up to your
		old sendmail and sendmail.cf?  Or are there
		too many ancillary files and hooks to back up?

		gary kline