From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Apr 18 12:57:42 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from yertle.kciLink.com (yertle.kcilink.com [216.194.193.105]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B873B37B400 for ; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 12:57:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by yertle.kciLink.com (Postfix, from userid 100) id 677B0217A7; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 15:57:30 -0400 (EDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Vivek Khera To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Vipul's Razor doesn't like FreeBSD's weekly run output? Newsgroups: ml.freebsd.questions References: <20020418083415.A30442@freenix.no> <20020418140911.A17736@bps.jodocus.org> <20020418141001.F30442@freenix.no> X-Trace: lorax.kciLink.com 1019159150 36769 216.194.193.105 (18 Apr 2002 19:45:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: daemon@kciLink.com Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >>>>> "MAM" == Morten A Middelthon writes: MAM> Yes, that will solve the problem. But! Why does these mail trigger Vipul's MAM> Razor? because that message looks the same on every machine that generates a simple output, and some idiot added the signature of that message to vipul's razor's database. personally, i think spamassassin is much more effective at stopping spam, since it scores each message based on a set of tests that indicate spam and that indicate ligitimate mail. the scoring is very intelligently computed based on a large sample of mail. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek Khera, Ph.D. Khera Communications, Inc. Internet: khera@kciLink.com Rockville, MD +1-240-453-8497 AIM: vivekkhera Y!: vivek_khera http://www.khera.org/~vivek/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message