From owner-freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Fri Jul 29 16:36:03 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F2C8BA78A7 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2016 16:36:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ed@nuxi.nl) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 727151AF4 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2016 16:36:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ed@nuxi.nl) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 71C16BA78A6; Fri, 29 Jul 2016 16:36:03 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: arch@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7165FBA78A4 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2016 16:36:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ed@nuxi.nl) Received: from mail-yw0-x22c.google.com (mail-yw0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DB991AF2 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2016 16:36:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ed@nuxi.nl) Received: by mail-yw0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id u134so119867920ywg.3 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2016 09:36:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nuxi-nl.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=yV/s/5PQr301UFbMgB5cINRP6hz4wsFIaICjqSExrqY=; b=OJEQ+9jx5y0iudHfeFjIJ9+XEXVhLYkkjNqrRuJjsTO5JAHpFMFwXlsE/Fy0rR0Wi3 tHjY5G4unSj6TRYk7EjSaL6N7FI9WnUt3X7rj/Vsm2oOdTcKXxQmCrNbIqnDFEfbOvVI I+lBVKxTXpHojE+HG4qtze+boeR29KejRAEhOHhYfSbTHDDtKMA8X2zzZnL+EqUM4Hyc TU1ifwz5nBV3rS+AajfRpg/mFx2+mNHL7p4LdicgZwJAcpuVgf+h/9jncuRk3KjI+6JV Lz4To3n+czDY9R27ilrz/A/edL0lOeFp5hdL0bxAnoSl1cBzErlXgfp5BS4H/WtVagwx hWvw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=yV/s/5PQr301UFbMgB5cINRP6hz4wsFIaICjqSExrqY=; b=KyHOpEDQ1ncbAm3P4gYMBXkitqahuiAy4+uQsLf7cRmvouk7rlfxf1pWLfbP6RBRiJ VhPxpfnFlvuH9QsCUp9gPheuQLWYmY1r0Rf99bWxQHPEPypUCh+ZKSt1D2YUQsPSGDFn aYwu1dARVGUTPfzs5u1hp28NC5tMh2dgg/LkKR2XAdlrWC5gRpqjnj1HUPcycPC0+E56 IsY6/yV/at8wkyJTrs+Y2533kiVWceK7tSMyOo+o6IVrYF2Ed2OIopx6lGpw6Xusf8GM 7Rldn9DgC/i/VIyI3cddFHgZe0eWFYlTm1cWCA3Epnc743QirqlrfT6JWFum87AGNPXN 3LOg== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkooutqkguTEg97YUsCCdm2f4kOo+lgpjl20Rhk6PoOn0xSJOvefkn6vc9YLsQzSiWpYk2seqOHBxEiCi64XQ== X-Received: by 10.129.147.130 with SMTP id k124mr21506839ywg.116.1469810162070; Fri, 29 Jul 2016 09:36:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.13.201.71 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Jul 2016 09:36:01 -0700 (PDT) From: Ed Schouten Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2016 18:36:01 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: lib/libc/Versions.def: new symbol version for 12.x To: arch@freebsd.org Cc: Ed Maste Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2016 16:36:03 -0000 Hi there, In a couple of weeks from now I'm going to add new versions of basename() and dirname() to libc that are thread-safe. These should now use symbol version "FBSD_1.5", but a question that emaste@ and I have is: why don't these symbol version names follow the major versions of FreeBSD? As in, why not call this "FBSD_12.0" instead? Thoughts? -- Ed Schouten Nuxi, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands KvK-nr.: 62051717