From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Feb  4 17:04:40 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6280E16A420;
	Mon,  4 Feb 2008 17:04:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no)
Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A02313C459;
	Mon,  4 Feb 2008 17:04:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no)
Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAA21207E;
	Mon,  4 Feb 2008 18:04:31 +0100 (CET)
X-Spam-Tests: AWL
X-Spam-Learn: disabled
X-Spam-Score: -0.2/3.0
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on tim.des.no
Received: from ds4.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180])
	by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB0432049;
	Mon,  4 Feb 2008 18:04:31 +0100 (CET)
Received: by ds4.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id B0BA6844A0; Mon,  4 Feb 2008 18:04:31 +0100 (CET)
From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no>
To: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org>
References: <861w7um5o5.fsf@ds4.des.no>
	<e7db6d980802030759x6db9bf1dq8992542bd8d2e017@mail.gmail.com>
	<20080203162918.GK57756@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
	<20080203121112.426a8c25@kan.dnsalias.net> <86zlugeqaz.fsf@ds4.des.no>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0802041146260.13899@sea.ntplx.net>
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2008 18:04:31 +0100
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0802041146260.13899@sea.ntplx.net> (Daniel
	Eischen's message of "Mon\, 4 Feb 2008 11\:55\:52 -0500 \(EST\)")
Message-ID: <86r6fsd55s.fsf@ds4.des.no>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.1 (berkeley-unix)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, threads@freebsd.org,
	Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org>, current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Symbol versioning errors in libthr
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2008 17:04:40 -0000

Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org> writes:
> I question the bumping of FBSDprivate to 1.1.  FBSDprivate is special,
> it is only for use in our base system, and our supported method of
> updating our system is buildworkd/buildkernel - so any changes to
> FBSDprivate should be unnoticed.

A whole lot of assumptions there.  Bumping FBSDprivate costs nothing and
might save our a***s down the road if one of those assumptions turn out
to be false.

(unless you can show that it's actually harmful in some way?)

DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no