Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 21:53:43 -0500 From: Joe Altman <fj@panix.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Xorg log message: Radeon, DRM, re-init Message-ID: <20041217025343.GC25921@panix.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dec. 16th log: joe on anna ~ $: ll /var/log/Xorg.0.log root wheel 46031 Dec 16 21:06 /var/log/Xorg.0.log Old log: root wheel 43990 Dec 9 01:20 Xorg.0.log.old This message is from the new log, dated Dec 16, and appears at least five times, with the last one being approximately at 21:06 p.m. EST: (WW) RADEON(0): [RESUME] Cannot re-init Radeon hardware, DRM too old (need 1.9.0 or newer) It does not appear, at all, in the log from Dec 9. joe on anna ~ $: uname -a FreeBSD anna.chthonixia.net 4.10-STABLE FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE #0: Wed Nov 24 22:47:52 EST 2004 So whatever it is, it appears to have originated well after the last update to the world. I don't update bits and pieces; I do the whole thing all at once: kernel, userland, ports, everything. Looking further, it appears to have something to do w/ switching to and from VTs: joe on anna ~ $: ll /var/log/Xorg.0.log root wheel 46333 Dec 16 21:28 Xorg.0.log Google results: http://penguinppc.org/~daenzer/DRI/applied/radeon-resume-cleanup.diff @@ -1304,168 +1328,38 @@ int radeon_do_cleanup_cp( drm_device_t * /* This code will reinit the Radeon CP hardware after a resume from disc. * This patch is NOT to be confused with my and Michel Daenzer's earlier DRI reinit work, which de- and re-initialised the complete DRI at every VT switch. So what is it telling me, other than switching from X to a VT and back to X means that the hardware cannot be "re-inited"? In some thread, there was some mention of a memory leak, or what appeared to be a memory leak, related to this. Would a memory leak account for this: joe on anna ~ $: top last pid: 14454; load averages: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 up 7+20:31:36 21:53:37 55 processes: 3 running, 52 sleeping CPU states: 2.3% user, 0.0% nice, 2.7% system, 0.4% interrupt, 94.6% idle Mem: 214M Active, 410M Inact, 97M Wired, 27M Cache, 86M Buf, 4288K Free Swap: 1008M Total, 52K Used, 1008M Free PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME WCPU CPU COMMAND 164 joe 2 0 100M 92924K RUN 85:18 0.05% 0.05% Xorg Xorg at 100 Meg. Good, bad, irrelevant? BTW: it's interesting; but doesn't appear to me to be crucial. I'm mostly curious about the whole thing.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041217025343.GC25921>