From owner-freebsd-embedded@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Apr 11 14:35:27 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-embedded@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 665CE1065675;
	Mon, 11 Apr 2011 14:35:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (bsdimp.com [199.45.160.85])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FA4F8FC1A;
	Mon, 11 Apr 2011 14:35:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from 63.imp.bsdimp.com (63.imp.bsdimp.com [10.0.0.63])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p3BEUobi064552
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);
	Mon, 11 Apr 2011 08:31:51 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
In-Reply-To: <924400541.20110411125319@serebryakov.spb.ru>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 08:31:50 -0600
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <62AD945C-4357-433B-8BED-7E5BB9233B75@bsdimp.com>
References: <116932102.20110411113412@serebryakov.spb.ru>
	<BANLkTimh582Lbsn0JmXg1MZmpEB+TYr6Gw@mail.gmail.com>
	<924400541.20110411125319@serebryakov.spb.ru>
To: lev@freebsd.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1
	(harmony.bsdimp.com [10.0.0.6]);
	Mon, 11 Apr 2011 08:31:51 -0600 (MDT)
Cc: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Does somebody work on NanoBSD?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Dedicated and Embedded Systems <freebsd-embedded.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-embedded>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-embedded-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-embedded>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-embedded-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-embedded>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-embedded-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 14:35:27 -0000


On Apr 11, 2011, at 2:53 AM, Lev Serebryakov wrote:

> Hello, Olivier.
> You wrote 11 =C1=D0=D2=C5=CC=D1 2011 =C7., 11:51:09:
>=20
>>>  Does somebody work on NanoBSD? It was not MFCed for long time on =
one
>>> hand, and on other hand, support of NANO_LABEL, added to CURRENT, is =
completely
>>> broken and almost useless.
>> I'm using the NANO_LABEL support, and I didn't have any problem.
>> What's your label problem with nanobsd precisely ?
>  (1) Copied out "upgrade" image has always ${NANO_LABEL}s1 label, and
> needs manual mdconfig+tunefs before dumping on second code partition
>=20
>  (2) updatep2 script uses sed 's/${NANO_DRIVE}s1/${NANO_DRIVE}s2/'
> script, and if NANO_LABLE is in use (which sets NANO_DRIVE to
> "ufs/labels1") sed complains.

That hardly qualifies as completely broken.

Those are bugs, and I'll look at fixing them.

Warner