From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 4 13:08:36 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 109E416A4CE; Mon, 4 Oct 2004 13:08:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from shrike.submonkey.net (cpc2-cdif3-6-0-cust204.cdif.cable.ntl.com [81.103.67.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB6DE43D1F; Mon, 4 Oct 2004 13:08:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from setantae@submonkey.net) Received: from setantae by shrike.submonkey.net with local (Exim 4.42 (FreeBSD)) id 1CESZu-0007pT-Rl; Mon, 04 Oct 2004 14:08:34 +0100 Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2004 14:08:34 +0100 From: Ceri Davies To: Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav Message-ID: <20041004130834.GH2493@submonkey.net> Mail-Followup-To: Ceri Davies , Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav , Tim Robbins , src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org References: <200410041126.i94BQ273055417@repoman.freebsd.org> <20041004122205.GA13257@cat.robbins.dropbear.id.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="SGSxvnK+1Z2m6Yvc" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-PGP: finger ceri@FreeBSD.org User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Sender: Ceri Davies cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: Tim Robbins Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/bin/rm rm.1 rm.c X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2004 13:08:36 -0000 --SGSxvnK+1Z2m6Yvc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 02:44:30PM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: > Tim Robbins writes: > > I object to this change. >=20 > Do you really have nothing better to do with your time? Did you even > bother to read the blog entry Giorgios referred to, which specifically > mentioned that the relevant standards have been amended to allow this? It didn't mention which standard, and I guess from the lack of citation that you have that information to hand either. I suspect that the main objection to this commit is that even those who were for it wanted it done a different way. Yet again it seems that the spoils have fallen to those prepared to just commit and shout "bikeshed!" at anyone who objects. Ceri --=20 --SGSxvnK+1Z2m6Yvc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBYUtSocfcwTS3JF8RAjwfAKDD5EGN+OWnu9s4G9HZWY5s0tNAiQCdEVut U77cW0bPzg3T6slIApsL5b0= =+p7H -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --SGSxvnK+1Z2m6Yvc--