From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Jan 20 05:27:54 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D42ABA88967 for ; Wed, 20 Jan 2016 05:27:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bhat.jayalakshmi@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yk0-x231.google.com (mail-yk0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96B3A1EB0 for ; Wed, 20 Jan 2016 05:27:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bhat.jayalakshmi@gmail.com) Received: by mail-yk0-x231.google.com with SMTP id v14so581270548ykd.3 for ; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 21:27:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=1aw4aG4ByJgbWgz0/8uaMKXCRAsVGG+SAgkAvtFBwZY=; b=GFXBTlFwCsdbH2EOTi98uCxEB1M02kQNDR5whj4mFwaj3i1n9MV4/TQsaBkIh3gWgk LX5BhcISyFYz6VpcxCH6lNm+w2cxMAYCIvslAOBQje5JPh72ntLfpwTV7JyKJq8zFkGk B+Wux/vbI7N284POglU4lrpkCKHNBuEknoSxF0e4Boq3Qll1NMgOaEdB7A0Gz7draGn8 OvMYOzmUBkBuLoRU72v30g0Yrcl/srnimVGUVKa8udwGGkVEAWCDOfhxLIildXUnjMMe kmzaX8Cf9RAvp0FRHUnOWGKUpIt4U7qVAaewE9Pock+Z9wqwbMdCW61WgJ58y9jkM7BV sMPw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=1aw4aG4ByJgbWgz0/8uaMKXCRAsVGG+SAgkAvtFBwZY=; b=Z5VGkP/GyaM102GOw1cSd1h5VPstSCyrkQjuXbtmj505lkcAhDcU592B6XDU3nZYcu IqAiNNlx2LcwC/9t7lrzSbRhlx/Jb5eDyQKT/lcs3Br0I+bxE1yJXDAxdjKxqCUcrzhJ +LGHBFWEmAbqIlNxMIvOMeXKPJSZpgLjoEIiz7zBWsHE+9TdGF70uP2RCaAhkZov8TLO d95X5yRCrokDXAGefknngGuyPZVMxGX01VRQlSJmJC29bVNP5GjUqlrtatiR8SNbbnSh U7Q5O1cKzp6kqBWA+eBgHzBF4KrMz6Vx9HKVtBGzt8uEf+jM+vJVjGwY1MEP5VA8uHP7 yM8A== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnd1VZaSZesL9Ip8lqrL8+jGlhzB9Q1M5rKeJ/Id3QNesmIY+CwgjDDNyuFMW+BbYh04oeQUM5wUHlHSdnPM4h0F8H7yg== X-Received: by 10.37.31.87 with SMTP id f84mr9524014ybf.151.1453267673802; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 21:27:53 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.129.76.193 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 21:27:14 -0800 (PST) From: Jayalakshmi bhat Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 10:57:14 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: network interface support in FreeBSD IPsec To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 05:27:54 -0000 Hi All, We have systems having multiple interfaces and would like to control IPsec policy per interface. We are investigating if FreeBSD IPsec supports specifying interface index in the Kernel IPsec policy. This would be helpful to control IPsec connections per interface. We are not seeing any such ifindex support in the latest 10.2 stable release. Could you please confirm if any ifindex option is available in Kernel IPsec policy options ? Regards Jayalakshmi