From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Dec 23 13: 0:22 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from phoenix.volant.org (phoenix.volant.org [205.179.79.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8DF114EFD for ; Thu, 23 Dec 1999 13:00:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from patl@phoenix.volant.org) Received: from asimov.phoenix.volant.org ([205.179.79.65]) by phoenix.volant.org with esmtp (Exim 1.92 #8) id 121FLL-0007EM-00; Thu, 23 Dec 1999 13:00:15 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by asimov.phoenix.volant.org (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) with SMTP id NAA24598; Thu, 23 Dec 1999 13:00:13 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 23 Dec 1999 13:00:13 -0800 (PST) From: patl@phoenix.volant.org Reply-To: patl@phoenix.volant.org Subject: Re: Virtual hosts: IP aliases on de0 or lo0 ? To: trouble@netquick.net Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <38628F66.F97D3A3@netquick.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On 23-Dec-99 at 12:53, TrouBle (trouble@netquick.net) wrote: > if im correct if you want them seen from the outside world they must be > bound to the nic card, not the loop back No, my old server has them bound to the loopback; and it works fine. You just need to make sure your routing is set up right. But I set up the old server back in the 2.0.5 days; and I'm re-visiting some of the decisions as I build up the new one. (I don't even remember why I decided to do it that way when I did...) -Pat To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message