From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 19:58:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2401106566B; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 19:58:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kes-kes@yandex.ru) Received: from forward12.mail.yandex.net (forward12.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:801::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 166458FC19; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 19:58:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp12.mail.yandex.net (smtp12.mail.yandex.net [95.108.131.191]) by forward12.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 70ADAC22EF2; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 23:58:00 +0400 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1326398280; bh=g+D1BXPv/mv5siEJMy8G13DiHAOx4BRSkVbtW8rfw5I=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:Message-ID:To:CC:Subject:In-Reply-To: References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=goTeoPjhR+6Y2dFo5UHbWTZ9nBASwR0JzETm8foUdwxKYTjvfQQS/Ik3WGuZSD1AJ /T6x4bc83ZyBCWKYcl6UvYeNA9RzgpU9Qy+ScYYgB+q/SYowvgxnFPFwChH/barP70 PWsjZLv7bWYgM4PXy1xTcBaq762Elo4myPmdQeOA= Received: from smtp12.mail.yandex.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp12.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 34FDA16A0485; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 23:58:00 +0400 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1326398280; bh=g+D1BXPv/mv5siEJMy8G13DiHAOx4BRSkVbtW8rfw5I=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:Message-ID:To:CC:Subject:In-Reply-To: References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=goTeoPjhR+6Y2dFo5UHbWTZ9nBASwR0JzETm8foUdwxKYTjvfQQS/Ik3WGuZSD1AJ /T6x4bc83ZyBCWKYcl6UvYeNA9RzgpU9Qy+ScYYgB+q/SYowvgxnFPFwChH/barP70 PWsjZLv7bWYgM4PXy1xTcBaq762Elo4myPmdQeOA= Received: from unknown (unknown [176.8.25.138]) by smtp12.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id vxCiMixb-vxCitglV; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 23:58:00 +0400 X-Yandex-Spam: 1 Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 21:57:57 +0200 From: =?windows-1251?B?yu7t/Oru4iDF4uPl7ejp?= X-Mailer: The Bat! (v4.0.24) Professional Organization: =?windows-1251?B?188gyu7t/Oru4iwgRnJlZUxpbmU=?= X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <17806711.20120112215757@yandex.ru> To: Lev Serebryakov In-Reply-To: <188797811.20120112150715@serebryakov.spb.ru> References: <1379921442.20120112133112@serebryakov.spb.ru> <4F0EADE1.9070803@FreeBSD.org> <1699441022.20120112140525@serebryakov.spb.ru> <4F0EB625.3000905@FreeBSD.org> <1378125765.20120112150020@serebryakov.spb.ru> <188797811.20120112150715@serebryakov.spb.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, Andriy Gapon Subject: Re[2]: SCHED_ULE / NetGraph interaction broken somwhere between r227874 and r229818 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: =?windows-1251?B?yu7t/Oru4iDF4uPl7ejp?= List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 19:58:02 -0000 Здравствуйте, Lev. Вы писали 12 января 2012 г., 13:07:15: LS> Hello, Lev. LS> You wrote 12 января 2012 г., 15:00:20: >>> But what mav says makes sense. >> It is it -- stack size. Setting KSTACK_PAGES=6 fixes situation. LS> OOOPS. Not. After another 5 minutes ng_queue again consumes 100% CPU LS> :( FreeBSD r229881 10-CURRENT IF Load http://piccy.info/view3/2474120/f4a4eb06a8af54434e9643024737ae30/orig/ CPU load http://piccy.info/view3/2474125/0d4474f8f3f4491eb49a11cdf3a301f4/orig/ if traffic goes normal: there are {irq256: re0}, ng_queue and netisr threads in top when there is fall: {irq256: re0}, ng_queue and no intr{swi1: netisr 3} in top, when intr{swi1: netisr 3} appear in 'top' then traffic starts to flow normally until next fall: 16:05; 16:28, 18:05: 18:30, 19:05: 19:30 it is like 30min interval. 19:45 is reboot Also freebsd stops to work on igb after couple of hours. There is no such problem on re -- С уважением, Коньков mailto:kes-kes@yandex.ru