From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Jan 17 14:40:55 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from m0.cs.berkeley.edu (m0.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.45.176]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1F9D1500D; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 14:40:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from asami@stampede.cs.berkeley.edu) Received: from silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (sji-ca7-245.ix.netcom.com [209.109.235.245]) by m0.cs.berkeley.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA59827; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 14:40:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from asami@stampede.cs.berkeley.edu) Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (8.9.3/8.6.9) id OAA03100; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 14:39:34 -0800 (PST) To: Kris Kennaway Cc: current@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Rolling OSVERSION References: From: asami@freebsd.org (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) Date: 17 Jan 2000 14:39:30 -0800 In-Reply-To: Kris Kennaway's message of "Mon, 17 Jan 2000 12:52:29 -0800 (PST)" Message-ID: Lines: 10 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.5 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org * From: Kris Kennaway * Unless anyone objects I'm going to bump OSVERSION tonight to provide a * cutoff for whether or not openssl is available in the base system. Ports * need to behave differently in either case.. Sounds fine, but the people in -current land probably know that variable as __FreeBSD_version.... :) Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message