Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 12:34:40 +0100 From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> To: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: Do we need a new major category (latex)? Message-ID: <20040128123440.2e0e1389@Magellan.Leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <4016FAEA.8010308@fillmore-labs.com> References: <20040127145518.33cd1648@Magellan.Leidinger.net> <20040127234019.GA70137@xor.obsecurity.org> <4016FAEA.8010308@fillmore-labs.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 00:57:30 +0100
Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com> wrote:
[ls -1 vs. ls -d]
> Otherwise you'll count files, CVS directories and empty lines. We have
> 'only' 216 ports in print...
Argh... yes. I make this error _every_ time. In case I want to see the
files I notice it immediately, but in this case I just piped the output
into wc without looking at the output.
The benchmark category has 30 entries (ls /usr/ports/benchmarks | grep
-vE '(pkg|CVS|Makefile)' |wc -l) and there are 42 packages with latex in
the name (ls -d */*latex*| grep -vE '(pkg|CVS|Makefile)' |wc -l), and 36
additional portnames with "tex" but without "text" (yes, this excludes
texproc: ls -d */*tex*| grep -vE '(pkg|CVS|Makefile|text)' |wc -l), so I
think this is still a good idea (we don't have teTeX and similar ports
in this listing).
Bye,
Alexander.
--
I will be available to get hired in April 2004.
http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net
GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91 3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040128123440.2e0e1389>