From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Mar 11 13: 8:37 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from linux.ssc.nsu.ru (linux.ssc.nsu.ru [193.124.219.91]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 20AAC37B718 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 13:08:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from danfe@inet.ssc.nsu.ru) Received: (qmail 2199 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2001 21:08:28 -0000 Received: from inet.ssc.nsu.ru (62.76.110.12) by hub.freebsd.org with SMTP; 11 Mar 2001 21:08:28 -0000 Received: from localhost (danfe@localhost) by inet.ssc.nsu.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA23045; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 03:07:54 +0600 Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 03:07:53 +0600 (NOVT) From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Jordan Hubbard Cc: thierry@herbelot.com, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Porting NVidia linux kernel modules to FreeBSD In-Reply-To: <20010311121646B.jkh@osd.bsdi.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 11 Mar 2001, Jordan Hubbard wrote: > > 3D acceleration (or the lack thereof) is supposed to be one of the > > reasons why XFree 336 is still the standard version delivered for > > FreeBSD. > > It is, at least for me. I've been waiting for XFree86 4.0.x to come > up to the same FPS performance numbers since it came out. So, are you saying that 3.3.6 performs better than 4.0.2? If this is true I might dump 4.0.2 and go for 3.3.6 (luckily there's server with ttf support builtin). -- WBR, Alexey To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message