From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Mar 10 14:52:31 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C17F16A4CE
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 10 Mar 2004 14:52:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.filmkern.com (206-169-45-174.gen.twtelecom.net
	[206.169.45.174])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 369D543D39
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 10 Mar 2004 14:52:31 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from darom@filmkern.com)
Received: (qmail 3371 invoked by uid 5004); 10 Mar 2004 14:52:31 -0800
Received: from darom@filmkern.com by mail by uid 5001 with qmail-scanner-1.16 
 (spamassassin: 2.54.  Clear:. 
 Processed in 0.025578 secs); 10 Mar 2004 22:52:31 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO filmkern.com) (127.0.0.1)
  by 0 with SMTP; 10 Mar 2004 14:52:30 -0800
Received: from 206.169.45.183
        (SquirrelMail authenticated user darom@filmkern.com)
        by mail.filmkern.com with HTTP;
        Wed, 10 Mar 2004 14:52:30 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <16220.206.169.45.183.1078959150.squirrel@mail.filmkern.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 14:52:30 -0800 (PST)
From: "Denis R." <darom@filmkern.com>
To: <mark@ukug.uk.freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <404F92E7.2090702@ukug.uk.freebsd.org>
References: <22997.206.169.45.183.1078952848.squirrel@mail.filmkern.com>
        <404F92E7.2090702@ukug.uk.freebsd.org>
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: SquirrelMail (version 1.2.11)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: SOLVED :-) Re: Wierd time changes
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: darom@filmkern.com
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 22:52:31 -0000

Mark,

No clue from sysctl -a. Yes, I've looked through archives and google.
Since I don't see a lot of performance improvement from using the second
CPU, I will leave this issue alone for now. Hopefully, someone will post a
sweet solution to this bugging issue.

Thanks for your help,
Denis


> Only to try with different value for kern.timecounter.method, but that's
>  just a guess. Does the output from ''sysctl -a kern.timecounter'' yield
>  any clues?
>
> Apart from that I really can't be of any help. I take it you've done the
>  obvious and searched the mailing list and Google?