Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 20 Dec 2015 11:14:12 -0600
From:      Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com>
To:        Sergey Manucharian <sm@ara-ler.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: mounting udf
Message-ID:  <CA%2BtpaK00sz7%2BtH5ikXafrvkKA_xmAiqajAwFSnxMf0W3-6SMZQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20151220162856.GC4053@dendrobates.araler.com>
References:  <20151219171651.12f1da2d@jive.levalinux.org> <20151219191010.21d4af06.freebsd@edvax.de> <20151219204039.70b2b91b@jive.levalinux.org> <20151219210321.c5438bdc.freebsd@edvax.de> <20151220060715.GJ22018@dendrobates.araler.com> <CAOc73CB2qNCAAKMraaaGG%2BUqowpw%2BeZPnEE1VUb7-ASnLu%2Bzww@mail.gmail.com> <20151220162856.GC4053@dendrobates.araler.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 10:28 AM, Sergey Manucharian <sm@ara-ler.com> wrote:

> Nope. Nothing new. I've also reformatted it in Windows (which created a
> partition). Still works fine in Linux, but not in FreeBSD:
>
> # fstyp /dev/da0s1
> fstyp: /dev/da0s1: filesystem not recognized
>
> # mount_udf -v /dev/da0 /mnt/tmp/
> mount_udf: /dev/da0: Invalid argument
>

You are preforming operations on two different block devices.  I cannot
understand why.  The prior output from linux indicates /dev/da0 is the only
one you should care about.



-- 
Adam



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2BtpaK00sz7%2BtH5ikXafrvkKA_xmAiqajAwFSnxMf0W3-6SMZQ>