Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 08:33:43 -0800 From: Daxbert <daxbert_news@dweebsoft.com> To: Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org> Cc: Cliff Sarginson <cls@raggedclown.net>, "" <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: portupgrade mess Message-ID: <1047659623.3e720467d25ab@ra.dweebsoft.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quoting Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org>: > In <1047613811.3e715173c05c0@ra.dweebsoft.com>, Daxbert > <daxbert_news@dweebsoft.com> typed: > > Quoting Cliff Sarginson <cls@raggedclown.net>: > > > > BTW, any idea how I could reduce the size of the /usr/ports slice - > it's > > > > max is about 2Gb and there is about 1.7 in use. It seems a bit bloated > and > > > > I certainly don't need all the stuff that is in there... > > > Delete everything in "/usr/ports/distfiles". > > > And before you go to bed one night do a "make clean" from "/usr/ports". > > > It takes .... some time... > > Another option is to add the following to your make.conf > > ( 5.x: /etc/make.conf 4.x: /etc/defaults/make.conf ) > > No! 4.x is /etc/make.conf as well. It just doesn't have one by > default, whereas 5.x does. You should *never* edit anything in > /etc/defaults. > > <mike > -- Ok... so why in 5.x does make.conf no longer live in /etc/defaults as well? --daxbert To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1047659623.3e720467d25ab>