From owner-freebsd-pkgbase@freebsd.org Wed Aug 10 22:50:24 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pkgbase@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A878BB58CA for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 22:50:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com) Received: from echo.brtsvcs.net (echo.brtsvcs.net [IPv6:2607:f740:c::4ae]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 788A11808 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 22:50:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com) Received: from chombo.houseloki.net (c-73-240-250-185.hsd1.or.comcast.net [73.240.250.185]) by echo.brtsvcs.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A64E5001E; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 22:50:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:fe80::7102:4df8:1f13:5c55] (unknown [IPv6:fe80::7102:4df8:1f13:5c55]) by chombo.houseloki.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E08DE1A5F; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 15:50:15 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: pkgbase and interim freebsd builds To: krad References: <3eb72f44-70fd-96b5-9aaa-c85512ca7de8@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-pkgbase@freebsd.org From: Mel Pilgrim Message-ID: <86b01a44-3eb5-05f6-1884-bf811f2e08bc@bluerosetech.com> Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 15:50:17 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-pkgbase@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Packaging the FreeBSD base system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 22:50:24 -0000 On 2016-08-10 06:24, krad wrote: > true its not elegant though is it, as ultimately it will want to be > integrated into a standard patching schedule. I just want to make sure i'm > not missing something, or its just in the pipeline. Maybe the svn revision > number could be embedded into the package version ? The build date is appended to the version number: # pkg info -xf FreeBSD-kernel FreeBSD-kernel-generic-12.0.s20160726192118 Name : FreeBSD-kernel-generic Version : 12.0.s20160726192118 Installed on : Tue Jul 26 20:21:48 2016 UTC Origin : base Architecture : freebsd:12:x86:64 Prefix : / Categories : base Licenses : BSD2CLAUSE Maintainer : re@FreeBSD.org WWW : https://www.FreeBSD.org Comment : FreeBSD GENERIC kernel Annotations : repo_type : binary repository : FreeBSD-base Flat size : 108MiB Description : FreeBSD GENERIC kernel Is this not the case in 11-stable? > On 10 August 2016 at 13:54, Henry Vogt wrote: > >> >> Am 10.08.16 um 14:21 schrieb krad: >>> Hi, I am currently testing pkgbase on a few jails and have setup my own >>> repo for the base OS package files. This is working fine at a certain >>> level >>> however I have noticed if i do an interim build of freebsd 11-stable from >>> svn, the base packages dont get updated via pkgbase even though the repo >>> files have newly build packages. I'm guess this is because the version of >>> the packages currently is 11.0, so nothing will get updated until they >>> are >>> bumped to 11.1. Is there any way to modify this behaviour so that interim >>> builds are captured, as I mostly do weekly builds of stable? >>> >> >> You can always force a re-install using >> >> pkg -f -r >> >> Best >> Henry