From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 21 17:46:00 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 719D2106564A for ; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:46:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ansarm@gmail.com) Received: from yx-out-2324.google.com (yx-out-2324.google.com [74.125.44.28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EAAE8FC19 for ; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:45:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ansarm@gmail.com) Received: by yx-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 8so462309yxb.13 for ; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 09:45:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:cc:references :in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:content-language:thread-index; bh=JmSa5D/8+DreVdFGeD0VJ21g3zntS5RzZjrKdKzP+q0=; b=wHkF+7cbodXP28Bt3F2crvmUy9pj85mlLmX4DEXe9Qv8jenaSytrJE0ZGa5ungCbZg hhSyc8fEapSXKRJ+2GWXiCJLwxq+7XMZQVbShFNv/FWRgLc4sku5Kvve8AnCep2gj7M6 EHHjcv1tjmlI722hSn/EA6LHSvNVT4J9KU0CU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer :content-language:thread-index; b=UIF36yhdBlSHOqDzTvovDzsQ0ggZOkyL/9eEf1VFfD7VHVWTfdkRrSjEchlWdnrIdg DKWz3EbbaPoCw6FsutM3cDO67t73R9+EB9sM1YmGiSM8bPLOSWXpPX7JlvY7btyE+lDn AVDzMd7Q0MdTrOEZWwiGD1eBmV5cIRvhk1GLM= Received: by 10.65.84.15 with SMTP id m15mr670488qbl.54.1227289558803; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 09:45:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from ansarmm2 (206-248-190-95.dsl.teksavvy.com [206.248.190.95]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k27sm3040249qba.10.2008.11.21.09.45.54 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 21 Nov 2008 09:45:57 -0800 (PST) From: "Ansar Mohammed" To: "'Wojciech Puchar'" References: <001101c94bea$f6a94a50$e3fbdef0$@com> <20081121173520.A2549@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <20081121173520.A2549@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:45:48 -0500 Message-ID: <006701c94c01$01b27280$05175780$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Content-Language: en-ca Thread-Index: AclL91dGhVhve7kkTqa8LW2wOiPE6AACWC4A Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Kernel SMB performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:46:00 -0000 > > > We are considering using an application that uses FreeBSD web servers > in > > front of Windows file servers. How reliable/scalable is the kernel > SMB > > module? > no idea. it worked many times when i wanted to fetch few files from > windows. but i don't think anyone really cares very much about it being > very well tested, bug free and high performance (i may be wrong here). I think you are. We should care about a KERNEL module being bug free and high performance. If not, hey why not just use DOS.