From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 20 18:41:21 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F31E116A418; Thu, 20 Dec 2007 18:41:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (bsdimp.com [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A975413C467; Thu, 20 Dec 2007 18:41:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id lBKIc6eX021389; Thu, 20 Dec 2007 11:38:06 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 11:41:01 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <20071220.114101.228909062.imp@bsdimp.com> To: sobomax@freebsd.org From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <476AB5EC.9060204@FreeBSD.org> References: <47682ED1.7000702@FreeBSD.org> <20071220.112405.-713486157.imp@bsdimp.com> <476AB5EC.9060204@FreeBSD.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 5.2 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: arch@freebsd.org, rwatson@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DDB scripting, output capture, and textdumps X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 18:41:21 -0000 In message: <476AB5EC.9060204@FreeBSD.org> Maxim Sobolev writes: : M. Warner Losh wrote: : > In message: <47682ED1.7000702@FreeBSD.org> : > Maxim Sobolev writes: : > : Robert Watson wrote: : > : > buffer, kernel message buffer, kernel configuration (if compiled into : > : > the kernel), panic message, and kernel version string. These are : > : : > : : > : Just a sidenote - maybe as part of this change it makes sense to make : > : compiling configuration into a kernel opt-out, not opt-in? We are in : > : 21st century, nobody really cares about saving few kilobytes of kernel : > : memory anymore. : > : > In the embedded world, it matters. : > : > And we already have opt-out. 'include GENERIC; nodev X, nodev Y, : > nodev Z' : : So what is your point, exactly? In embedded word nobody runs GENERIC, : and you know it better than anybody else. : : My point that Joe User, who runs GENERIC or slightly modified GENERIC : should have kernel config compiled into kernel so that when something : happens this information is available for debugging purposes. That makes sense. I thought you were talking about something different, so I'm just going to say "I'm in violent agreement." Warner