From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 20 01:48:40 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F004E16A4CE for ; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 01:48:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lists.freedombi.com (thedalesgroup.com [207.179.98.220]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 747FC43D3F for ; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 01:48:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from charles@idealso.com) Received: by lists.freedombi.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 17FF872831; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 21:48:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: from freedombi.com (localhost [192.168.10.108]) by lists.freedombi.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 6C822724AF for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 21:48:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 207.179.91.96 (SquirrelMail authenticated user charles) by freedombi.com with HTTP; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 21:48:36 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <49225.207.179.91.96.1092966516.squirrel@freedombi.com> Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 21:48:36 -0400 (EDT) From: "Charles Ulrich" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on freedombi.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.7 required=7.0 tests=BAYES_00,PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 Subject: portindex and INDEX.db X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 01:48:40 -0000 Is there any downside to generating INDEX.db with the sysutils/portindex program rather than portsdb -Uu? -- Charles Ulrich System Administrator Ideal Solution - http://www.idealso.com