From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed May 4 10:37:21 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB306B2BB8A for ; Wed, 4 May 2016 10:37:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FBA41F36 for ; Wed, 4 May 2016 10:37:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id u44AbG9V076681 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 4 May 2016 04:37:16 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id u44AbFdL076678; Wed, 4 May 2016 04:37:15 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 04:37:15 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Manish Jain cc: Polytropon , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu Subject: Re: Is 10.3 i386 jinxed ? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20160430084415.03be443d.freebsd@edvax.de> <5724604D.3020804@hotmail.com> <20160430203426.a9d5841b.freebsd@edvax.de> <5725CF38.4090007@hotmail.com> <572752E2.2040708@hotmail.com> <20160503181839.2aacad7e.freebsd@edvax.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 04 May 2016 04:37:16 -0600 (MDT) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 May 2016 10:37:21 -0000 On Wed, 4 May 2016, Manish Jain wrote: > On 05/04/16 10:35, Warren Block wrote: >> On Wed, 4 May 2016, Manish Jain wrote: >> >>> What is printed underneath is NE56R14l-B9502G32Mnks >>> >>> I can't be sure whether the l is actually l or I or 1 >> >> Looks like this one: >> http://in.gateway.com/gw/en/IN/content/model/NX.Y1USI.005 >> >> Which does not have a separate GPU, and means that the bad memory would be >> in one of the removable DIMMs. >> >> > > > Something to cheer about, at last. But then why does not memtest86+ pick up > any errors in 65 passes ? Possibly because they are hidden by being in an area of memory that memtest86 can't test. Testing with only one DIMM could change that, or changing the amount of RAM allocated to video in the BIOS. Only change one thing at a time.