From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 25 21:09:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA504106566C for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 21:09:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from temporal@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f54.google.com (mail-ew0-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A65B8FC12 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 21:09:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy28 with SMTP id 28so1909725ewy.13 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 14:09:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=LpyC+AKMhoRcH8CrbwN2Vtw6L+CpK98K3148wscEQvU=; b=TbnVN1tTp0+jN0WSq1zR4EWwQ8MaGfwU1Jb0MTnDtF+lOuG6fGXUPoN1qC5FMAG7bo WP0DaUlAeBAoYvD33e6yMxz2pxSAPXKH3PCuP4CTilLkpbncfoJ/ZtACRRdaXUNuR4k6 +RXYnmj5iJsA1cdCVhk0yCUD7LhqmpZT+NmJg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=Z+wMC8JRSb3eo4ZfBoCMb0v8ez2/qcKnpbqupp+DUqJwgxK0HeKKgL8bdZnkKfyHvR PV0hsmKMFSBZTfRlp/ZouuJmptsLYNiwceMJTXVyPb1g9Pmc4C40qhTgw4CwT7TI0TbG dhwFyAN7wQ061Mi+aWyN55vM/H4me0Odmy9G8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.28.16 with SMTP id k16mr2267198ebc.61.1288040981977; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 14:09:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.119.141 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 14:09:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 14:09:41 -0700 Message-ID: From: Kenton Varda To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, ivoras@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: EVFILT_VNODE doesn't scale to large directory trees? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 21:09:43 -0000 Ivan Voras wrote: > Short answer: no. > > Long answer: There should be. There were past discussions on writing > such a facility to e.g. receive events for all files on per-mountpoint > basis (which you could filter...), but we're not there yet. Thanks! That answers my question. I'll find some sort of hack for now. (Sorry, I didn't see this answer at first since I wasn't CC'd.)