Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 21:59:47 -0500 From: Joe Altman <fj@panix.com> To: Jonathan Franks <daemon@taconic.net> Cc: Eric Schuele <e.schuele@computer.org> Subject: Re: Trouble with 'portsdb -uU' and ld-elf.so... Message-ID: <20041217025947.GD25921@panix.com> In-Reply-To: <41C244D3.8090204@taconic.net> References: <41C1B2B7.4050602@computer.org> <20041217015720.GB25921@panix.com> <41C244D3.8090204@taconic.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 09:30:43PM -0500, Jonathan Franks wrote:
> Joe Altman wrote:
>
> >On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 10:07:19AM -0600, Eric Schuele wrote:
>
> >>K_1_2 Segmentation fault (core dumped) JAVA_PORT_LINUX_IBM_JDK_1_3 |
> >>/usr/bin/awk '{ print $1 }'" returned non-zero status
> >>===> java/javamail failed
> >>*** Error code 1
> >>2 errors
> >>/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: rm: Shared object has no run-time symbol table
> >
> From what I've heard, portsdb -Uu is not preferred in 5.3, rather one
> should do make fetchindex in /usr/ports then run portsdb -u afterwards.
> I've only HEARD that this is correct, but it worked for me..... so make
> of it what you will....
I've used it on my 5.3 box; it seems fine. My experience doesn't mean
you are wrong.
Anyway, to my eye, it's not portsdb that is failing; in the first
example, it's awk:
> >>K_1_2 Segmentation fault (core dumped) JAVA_PORT_LINUX_IBM_JDK_1_3
> >>/usr/bin/awk '{ print $1 }'" returned non-zero status
It just happens to be failing within portsdb, at that point.
His second example had to do with running ls; that also failed, with
the same message:
Shared object has no run-time symbol table
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041217025947.GD25921>