From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 30 18:22:57 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 950B816A4CF for ; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 18:22:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [204.156.12.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D31C43F85 for ; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 18:22:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fledge.watson.org (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hB12KGMg076131; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 21:20:16 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Received: from localhost (robert@localhost)hB12KGTv076128; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 21:20:16 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 21:20:16 -0500 (EST) From: Robert Watson X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: Brett Glass In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.2.20031130191600.03653c80@localhost> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Does 4.9-RELEASE work with 3Ware RAID card? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 02:22:57 -0000 On Sun, 30 Nov 2003, Brett Glass wrote: > At 03:36 PM 11/30/2003, Robert Watson wrote: > > >Not sure if you ever got an answer to the affirmative, but I'm running > >several personal servers on 4.9-RC and 4.9-RELEASE quite smoothly with the > >twe driver. > > I got some encouraging reports, and so tried it. The machine, which has > an Escalade 6800, does seem to be running OK. I had to upgrade it to the > latest firmware, as you mentioned -- not only to make it stable but to > get it to recognize large hard drives and enable the use of a "hot > spare." For some reason, 3Ware requires you to upgrade twice -- once to > an intermediate version and then to the latest -- if you still have the > original firmware on the board, which this one did. Yeah, I completely forgot about that -- only one of my systems has "large hard disks" requiring the second firmware upgrade, but indeed, that is another reason to make sure the firmware is really up-to-date. Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects robert@fledge.watson.org Senior Research Scientist, McAfee Research