Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 17 Feb 2017 18:34:37 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 211746] [Hyper-V] UEFI VM can't boot from the iso installation disk
Message-ID:  <bug-211746-27103-oVISkbLJIh@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-211746-27103@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-211746-27103@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D211746

--- Comment #17 from Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@FreeBSD.org> ---
I think the complexity of having the kernel at any other physical address is
what has us do the staging/copying. It was a quick-n-dirty mechanism that
avoided a lot of work and complexity -- which is ok if you don't know it's
worth/needed to go through all that hassle. And I guess it looks like we now
hit a case that warrants us to start looking at a real solution.

As an example (for inspiration):
For Itanium I had the kernel link against a fixed virtual address. The load=
er
built the VA-to-PA mapping based on where EFI allocated blobs of memory. The
mapping was loaded/activated prior to booting the kernel and the loader gave
the kernel all the information it needed to work with the mapping. This mak=
es
it possible to allocate memory before the VM system is up and running.
Ultimately the mapping needs to be incorporated into the VM system and this=
 is
where different CPU architectures have different challenges and solutions.

Note that there are advantages to having the kernel link against a virtual
address. In general it makes it easier to load or relocate the kernel anywh=
ere
and this enables a few capabilities that other OSes already have and then s=
ome.

There are also downsides. You may need to support a large VA range if you w=
ant
to support pre-loading CD-ROM images or run entirely form a memory disk tha=
t's
preloaded. A few GB of address space would be good to have.

Anyway: It's probably time that to you restate this bug into an architectur=
al
(x86-specific for now) problem and have a discussion on the arch@ mailing l=
ist.

We need a more people involved to bring this to a closure.
Good luck

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-211746-27103-oVISkbLJIh>