From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 10 03:53:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D47916A47B; Sun, 10 Sep 2006 03:53:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scrappy@freebsd.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDD0A43D46; Sun, 10 Sep 2006 03:53:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@freebsd.org) Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66EAF291AFE; Sun, 10 Sep 2006 00:53:55 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28350-05; Sun, 10 Sep 2006 00:54:07 -0300 (ADT) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (blk-137-86-60.eastlink.ca [24.137.86.60]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7ACE290C74; Sun, 10 Sep 2006 00:53:54 -0300 (ADT) Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1027) id B6477344CD; Sun, 10 Sep 2006 00:53:54 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B57CB33D53; Sun, 10 Sep 2006 00:53:54 -0300 (ADT) Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 00:53:54 -0300 (ADT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" X-X-Sender: freebsd@ganymede.hub.org To: Mark Linimon In-Reply-To: <20060910023619.GA32206@soaustin.net> Message-ID: <20060910005241.O1031@ganymede.hub.org> References: <200609100159.k8A1xAIn089481@drugs.dv.isc.org> <20060909231448.E1031@ganymede.hub.org> <20060910023619.GA32206@soaustin.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Mark Andrews , "Marc G. Fournier" Subject: Re: ARRRRGH! Guys, who's breaking -STABLE's GMIRROR code?! X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 03:53:58 -0000 On Sat, 9 Sep 2006, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 11:16:29PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote: >> This should be documented somewhere clearly then, as my understanding was >> that -STABLE meant that anything MFCd back to it *was* tested and deemed >> stable ... > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/version-guide/decision-points.html > >> but "blantant and obvious bugs due to insufficient testing", IMHO, doesn't >> classify as an 'oops' .... > > You've already made this point -- 3 times. What would you like us to do > now, punish the committer? Huh? My first post on this thread was in defense of MFCng into STABLE and acknowledging that 'mistakes happen', and then this one ... ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664