From owner-freebsd-java Mon May 4 17:25:45 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA07888 for freebsd-java-outgoing; Mon, 4 May 1998 17:25:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from damon.com (656NtixsVtJGhCCmWhz42e7R0WZm7XDj@damon.com [207.170.114.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA07863 for ; Mon, 4 May 1998 17:25:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dap@damon.com) Received: (from dap@localhost) by damon.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id TAA16848; Mon, 4 May 1998 19:25:21 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dap) From: Damon Permezel Message-Id: <199805050025.TAA16848@damon.com> Subject: Re: FreeBSD will need threads for Apache 2.0 In-Reply-To: <354E2299.1717E0C8@plutotech.com> from Sean Kelly at "May 4, 98 02:18:34 pm" To: kelly@plutotech.com (Sean Kelly) Date: Mon, 4 May 1998 19:25:21 -0500 (CDT) Cc: java@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL32 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org "Sean Kelly sez: " > On the chat list, John Dyson said: > > Brett Glass said: > > > Guess that FreeBSD is likely to need threads.... A la Linux or > > > NeXTStep. > > That is 100% going to be there (it has to be.) Part of my job > > is to help make sure that we have kernel threads. > > What do the FreeBSD Java developers think of this? Are we going to see > some integration between the OS threads and Java, or are we planning on > sticking with green threads for awhile? > No way! I even volunteered back when I had more time to be involved in the kernel threads effort so I could use them instead of green_threads. No time now, though... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message