Date: Thu, 2 Oct 1997 23:21:55 -0700 (PDT) From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) To: dg@root.com Cc: rgrimes@GndRsh.aac.dev.com, jkh@time.cdrom.com, andrsn@andrsn.stanford.edu, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CVSUP vs. SNAPS Message-ID: <199710030621.XAA12545@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> In-Reply-To: <199710021544.IAA21048@implode.root.com> (message from David Greenman on Thu, 02 Oct 1997 08:44:23 -0700)
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* No, "2.2" refers to the branch, not to a release. I think we make that * pretty clear. Yep. Besides, what are we going to call 3.0-CURRENT before the 3.0 release then? (2.9999-CURRENT? :) It's going to be 3.0-CURRENT for a while after the release, and we'll have the same "problem". That is not going to be solved by confusing the release and branch names. Satoshi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199710030621.XAA12545>