From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Feb  4 21:36:42 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: sparc64@FreeBSD.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62E8116A420;
	Sat,  4 Feb 2006 21:36:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (vc4-2-0-87.dsl.netrack.net [199.45.160.85])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76EFF43D49;
	Sat,  4 Feb 2006 21:36:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Received: from localhost (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1] (may be forged))
	by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k14LXoQX016468;
	Sat, 4 Feb 2006 14:33:50 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 14:33:53 -0700 (MST)
Message-Id: <20060204.143353.109955782.imp@bsdimp.com>
To: ru@FreeBSD.org
From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <20060204211357.GD7604@ip.net.ua>
References: <20060204.085134.44793895.imp@bsdimp.com>
	<86irruao3i.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060204211357.GD7604@ip.net.ua>
X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0
	(harmony.bsdimp.com [127.0.0.1]);
	Sat, 04 Feb 2006 14:33:50 -0700 (MST)
Cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org, harti@FreeBSD.org, sparc64@FreeBSD.org,
	stable@FreeBSD.org, kris@obsecurity.org
Subject: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64
X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc <freebsd-sparc64.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-sparc64>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64>,
	<mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 21:36:42 -0000

In message: <20060204211357.GD7604@ip.net.ua>
            Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> writes:
: On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 09:03:13PM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
: > "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> writes:
: > > Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav <des@des.no> writes:
: > > > As I have repeatedly pointed out in the past, -O2 catches more
: > > > bugs because it enables optimizations which require more extensive
: > > > coverage analysis.
: > > Then it should be the default, standard flag.
: > 
: > I wish.  Unfortunately, there is a very vocal minority which
: > systematically opposes this kind of change.
: > 
: What breakage do you mean if tinderboxes are run without it and
: usually compile successfully?  :-)
: 
: I mean, I don't see a reason not to remove -fno-strict-aliasing
: from the kernel builds now.  Perhaps it's still needed for some
: platforms that aren't covered by tinderbox, not sure...  Can be
: easily checked with "make universe".

There's a dozen or two files that will fail to compile -O2 w/o it
spread through the tree.

Warner