From owner-freebsd-www@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 11 11:37:42 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-www@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA47737B401; Mon, 11 Aug 2003 11:37:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AECC43FBD; Mon, 11 Aug 2003 11:37:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ceri@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (ceri@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h7BIbgUp090517; Mon, 11 Aug 2003 11:37:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ceri@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from ceri@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h7BIbfjG090513; Mon, 11 Aug 2003 11:37:41 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 11:37:41 -0700 (PDT) From: Ceri Davies Message-Id: <200308111837.h7BIbfjG090513@freefall.freebsd.org> To: j.el-rayes@daemon.li, ceri@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-www@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: www/53803: news article about freebsd's role in sco case X-BeenThere: freebsd-www@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Project Webmasters List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 18:37:43 -0000 Synopsis: news article about freebsd's role in sco case State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: ceri State-Changed-When: Mon Aug 11 11:35:27 PDT 2003 State-Changed-Why: There's a general consensus in the community that we don't want to be seen as "gloating" over the SCO case; I think adding this article would be very close to that, and so I am closing this PR. If you strongly disagree then I'd suggest opening a discussion on the doc@FreeBSD.org list. Thanks for the submission all the same. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=53803