From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 11 16:11:01 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2FF95FE for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 16:11:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.95.76.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "troutmask", Issuer "troutmask" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F1BF16F0 for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 16:11:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t4BGAo5x089880 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 11 May 2015 09:10:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t4BGAnqn089879; Mon, 11 May 2015 09:10:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 09:10:49 -0700 From: Steve Kargl To: Jos Backus Cc: Lars Engels , freebsd-current , Lyndon Nerenberg Subject: Re: What to do about RCS/OpenRCS Message-ID: <20150511161049.GA89855@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <554BCD4C.8090500@FreeBSD.org> <3137063.YOSa6Au8Xi@ralph.baldwin.cx> <554D1DD5.5080106@FreeBSD.org> <554E2221.1040105@FreeBSD.org> <20150511093100.GC53149@e-new.0x20.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 16:11:01 -0000 On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 08:43:06AM -0700, Jos Backus wrote: > On May 11, 2015 2:31 AM, "Lars Engels" wrote: > > > > On Sat, May 09, 2015 at 11:27:57AM -0700, Jos Backus wrote: > > > Maybe off-topic, but functionality-wise it might make much more sense to > > > import Fossil. RCS has too many limitations this day and age when better > > > tools are available. Of course, this would require people to learn > > > something new, which I know can be a challenge. > > > > I really like fossil. But it's still under development, so it would soon > > be outdated. It's better installed from ports/packages. > > It seems OpenRCS is still under development ;-p It's better installed from > ports/packages, too. > > It would give Fossil a recognition boost as a BSD-licensed DVCS. > Please, just stop. Thanks. -- Steve