Date: Mon, 12 Aug 1996 22:17:03 +0300 (EET DST) From: Narvi <narvi@haldjas.folklore.ee> To: Ollivier Robert <roberto@keltia.freenix.fr> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD vs. NT Stability Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960812221537.7380G-100000@haldjas.folklore.ee> In-Reply-To: <199608121853.UAA02791@keltia.freenix.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 12 Aug 1996, Ollivier Robert wrote: > According to Dennis: > > 1) Its rather new... > > 2) It was written by Microsoft > > Blind bashing will never make things progress. > > >From what I've heard, NT is probably the first thing ever written by > Microsoft that can be called "Operating System" even if I don't agree with > many architectural and protocol choices (but I'm partial to Unix). > > It has flaws and bugs but which OS doesn't ? OK, how about getting along without another BSD vs. NT flame war? This thread started quite sensibly, for heavens sake, let's have it the favor of also ending so!!! Sander > -- > Ollivier ROBERT -=- The daemon is FREE! -=- roberto@keltia.freenix.fr > FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 2.2-CURRENT #17: Fri Aug 2 20:40:17 MET DST 1996 >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.960812221537.7380G-100000>