From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 10 02:30:53 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E0C737B401 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 02:30:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.mailbox.co.uk (smtp.mailbox.co.uk [195.82.125.32]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6ED743F3F for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 02:30:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wayne.pascoe@penguinpowered.org.uk) Received: from [212.18.244.168] (helo=marvin.penguinpowered.org.uk) by smtp.mailbox.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 193YOF-0006uY-00; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 10:30:40 +0100 Received: from waynep by marvin.penguinpowered.org.uk with local (Exim 3.33 #1) id 193YXl-000MrI-00; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 10:40:29 +0100 Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 10:40:29 +0100 From: Wayne Pascoe To: BSDVault Message-ID: <20030410094029.GA87830@marvin.penguinpowered.org.uk> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-System: FreeBSD i386 with kernel 4.8-STABLE Sender: User Waynep cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Trying to run ipf on 5.0 errors with : Device not found?? Doesn ?t devfs take care of this? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 09:30:53 -0000 On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 01:49:35PM -0400, BSDVault wrote: > I posted another question about missing MAKEDEV but now I am concerned that > I cannot run ipf. I moved from ipfw to ipf and tried to kldload the ipf > modules.. I get device not created or device not found errors even though I > have the correct entries in rc.conf. It is my understanding that devfs > should take care of this?? Anyone know any issues with this? Do I need to > compile ipfilter into the kernel? I've not been able to get ipf running on FreeBSD 5 as a module. I'm actually looking at moving to ipfw because of this. My main reason for using ipf in the past was that we had Solaris, FreeBSD and OpenBSD boxen and it was nice to have a unified firewall app. -- Wayne Pascoe