From owner-freebsd-doc Sun Sep 23 14:46: 2 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mail.urx.com (2811.dynacom.net [206.107.213.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1698837B42B for ; Sun, 23 Sep 2001 14:45:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from owt.com [206.159.132.160] by mail.urx.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-7.03) id A81452C01AC; Sun, 23 Sep 2001 14:45:56 -0700 Message-ID: <3BAE5814.FA97DA43@owt.com> Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 14:45:56 -0700 From: Kent Stewart Reply-To: kbstew99@hotmail.com Organization: One World Telecommunications X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mike Silbersack Cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Updating kernel build instructions References: <20010923163611.F79081-100000@achilles.silby.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Mike Silbersack wrote: > > I was just helping someone setup a freebsd 4.4 box, and I noticed that he > was using the old method of building kernels. I wondered where he was > getting this from, and checked the handbook on the website - sure enough, > we still list the directions. > > Since these directions are quite different than the buildkernel/buildworld > system, can we totally remove them? If not, they should be explained to > be mutually exclusive, NOT just two ways to do the same thing. Perhaps > the "old way" could be called "FreeBSD 4.2 and older", while the "new way" > could be called "FreeBSD 4.3 and above." Actually, once you have done a buildworld thru installworld, you can use the old way. It still applies if you haven't done a cvsup. What you missed reading was Note: Be sure to always check the file /usr/src/UPDATING, before you perform any update steps, in the case you sync your source-tree with the latest sources of the FreeBSD project. In this file all important issues with updating FreeBSD are written down. /usr/src/UPDATING always fits to your version of the FreeBSD source, and is therefore more accurate for those information than the handbook. I think Section 19.4 covers both ways pretty well. Kent > > If someone more familiar with docs could make one of the two changes, I'd > appreciate it. If not, I guess I'll have to dive in and learn docbook > next week. > > Thanks, > > Mike "Silby" Silbersack > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA mailto:kbstew99@hotmail.com http://kstewart.urx.com/kstewart/index.html FreeBSD News http://daily.daemonnews.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message