From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 29 22:00:42 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B8D516A401 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 22:00:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E08813C44C for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 22:00:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C2392084; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 23:36:26 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Tests: AWL X-Spam-Learn: disabled X-Spam-Score: 0.0/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on tim.des.no Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4084207E; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 23:36:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id AC926A1075; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 23:36:24 +0200 (CEST) From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Igor References: Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 23:36:24 +0200 In-Reply-To: (runixd@gmail.com's message of "Thu, 29 Mar 2007 21:34:22 +0100") Message-ID: <86648johpj.fsf@dwp.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nx-bit and TPM X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 22:00:42 -0000 Igor writes: > I'm was looking through handbook and wikipedia and it appears FreeBSD > doesn't support hardware (nor software) nx bit. > There also doesn't seem to be any support for TPM (Trusted Platform Modul= e). I believe NX support was never implemented because Intel's version of AMD64 didn't support it. As for TPM, I don't see the point. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no