From owner-freebsd-current  Sun Feb 20 20:59:12 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (GndRsh.dnsmgr.net [198.145.92.4])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 5D84F37BF0B; Sun, 20 Feb 2000 20:59:10 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from freebsd@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net)
Received: (from freebsd@localhost)
	by gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id UAA57679;
	Sun, 20 Feb 2000 20:59:05 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from freebsd)
From: "Rodney W. Grimes" <freebsd@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>
Message-Id: <200002210459.UAA57679@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>
Subject: Re: openssl in -current
In-Reply-To: <42144.951019612@zippy.cdrom.com> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at "Feb 19, 2000 08:06:52 pm"
To: jkh@zippy.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard)
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2000 20:59:04 -0800 (PST)
Cc: kris@FreeBSD.ORG (Kris Kennaway),
	salaman@teknos.com (Victor Salaman), freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> Hmmm.  I'm beginning to wonder if openssl shouldn't just be backed-out
> at this point.  The situation with RSA makes this far more problematic
> than I think anyone first thought, and I've seen a lot of breakage so
> far for what appears to be comparatively little gain over what we had
> before with the ports collection version.

I'll ack that:  ACK ACK ACK!!


-- 
Rod Grimes - KD7CAX @ CN85sl - (RWG25)               rgrimes@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message