Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 14:20:13 +0300 From: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> To: Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: RFC on a published change to FreeBSD 11 kqueue file ops. Message-ID: <20160427112013.GT2422@kib.kiev.ua> In-Reply-To: <d8be7f2b-10cb-5803-c970-199a80f351b7@freebsd.org> References: <d8be7f2b-10cb-5803-c970-199a80f351b7@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 11:32:05AM +0800, Julian Elischer wrote: > the following change is sitting out at github, to add kqueue support > for more file operations: > > https://github.com/dmatveev/libinotify-kqueue/blob/master/patches > > does anyone have reasons why we shouldn't import this change. > > libinotify is now a port and could use these. > Enabling open(2) on symlinks looks too radical. I will handle other patches.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160427112013.GT2422>