From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 3 17:29:53 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61D851065672 for ; Tue, 3 Apr 2012 17:29:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsb@berentweb.com) Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C61208FC12 for ; Tue, 3 Apr 2012 17:29:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lagv3 with SMTP id v3so6838690lag.13 for ; Tue, 03 Apr 2012 10:29:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=berentweb.com; s=google; h=mime-version:sender:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=tlWpxCgrgfKGo54DYhUaV4n3/ZIA4oXJR0mwDQXetEg=; b=YgtW3wjakJYdugrXNN44V35Stlgk0ag3cOm6fh8iUWCBKPkTNs0uhNwJ5uVPxzBs7e Y2BreUrDM7EYNG/I0nOcFYwCWVprIdnmoJazYMB2xydwYnv+zOYhcDnFC0WRh+X3onJI jKmTaA12bdsPOIsS05nWAireIQ5Cogcwb7Vj0= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :x-gm-message-state; bh=tlWpxCgrgfKGo54DYhUaV4n3/ZIA4oXJR0mwDQXetEg=; b=WWVzBFkcmJG0MUhVVLtl+vik7VqUo5tt4jINlm1W8sSuTRa+49iwUS3/O58DTtuGSZ x+6ZjkQUvllFRpbIVXle0GMQUgNoMyubWcWQ/YRyN8xUQmCCccxz+soWBICOz6Jds7OU Mm6FDpBP+4iSn9eL43YGYibmdpKVSj0boXdqftX+yikQ3yste1PMEy6ucATOpcdpZLgS xNOsg/wJbHQ48wZRycwDCFOgIILAQsw/PBaHc5IsisN+yZQCNqANcdjDD5de8oVYXn/Q jTBTNYptAssluLAc5T0NRXnNcC6LpIlxnrsjUdQMVmsb/2D926e6cPhylX/RV5Z+RUD/ ReUw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.132.166 with SMTP id ov6mr6251898lab.35.1333474191591; Tue, 03 Apr 2012 10:29:51 -0700 (PDT) Sender: rsb@berentweb.com Received: by 10.112.77.15 with HTTP; Tue, 3 Apr 2012 10:29:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [85.110.92.106] In-Reply-To: References: <20120329072054.GA45082@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <20120403074954.GA19241@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 20:29:51 +0300 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 0QevLboP9REi4hYcgoxS-_Wy_HE Message-ID: From: Beeblebrox To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnT6/ZG/2pMpEb+ZSTg9YTZk2NGddVF6MzyqaR35dm2Tw6xUqsnlZzVX00J04LPZAYrknls Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: lagg problems on diskless client X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2012 17:29:53 -0000 On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 7:46 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote: > On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 4:51 AM, Beeblebrox wrote: > > Slightly different point of view: Under this scenario of dikless clients > > having dual NICs would CRAP be a choice to consider? From what I have > read > Typo or editorial comment^^^^^^ -) > > it can offer loadbalancing but as I understand it's not really applicable > > to diskless node situations? > -- > R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer > E-mail: kob6558@gmail.com > That's hilarious. It's a typo. Correction C-A-R-P.