From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 19 18:59:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@www.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B62916A4CE for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 18:59:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from area51.capnet.state.tx.us (area51.capnet.state.tx.us [141.198.193.51]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CC2D43D46 for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 18:59:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from trorki@area51.capnet.state.tx.us) Received: from area51.capnet.state.tx.us (localhost.capnet.state.tx.us [127.0.0.1])iAJIucpU029875; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 12:56:38 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from trorki@area51.capnet.state.tx.us) Received: from localhost (stu@localhost)iAJIucuI029872; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 12:56:38 -0600 (CST) X-Authentication-Warning: area51.capnet.state.tx.us: stu owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 12:56:38 -0600 (CST) From: trorki@area51.capnet.state.tx.us X-X-Sender: stu@area51.capnet.state.tx.us To: Goran Gajic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20041119124946.J29849@area51.capnet.state.tx.us> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-amd64@www.freebsd.org Subject: Re: Too many mbufs X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: trorki@area51.capnet.state.tx.us List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 18:59:42 -0000 On Fri, 19 Nov 2004, Goran Gajic wrote: > Same with my dual amd64 4GB ram: > test# netstat -m > 18446744073709360129 mbufs in use > 8/25600 mbuf clusters in use (current/max) > 0/0/0 sfbufs in use (current/peak/max) > 18014398509434128 KBytes allocated to network > 0 requests for sfbufs denied > 0 requests for sfbufs delayed > 0 requests for I/O initiated by sendfile > 91 calls to protocol drain routines Would you people please include at least a `uname -a` with these posts, even better state the motherboard you're running with. I am NOT seeing this with a Tyan s2882, dual 244, with 4GB memory, on 5.3-R #0. I get the expected results: 65 mbufs in use 64/25600 mbuf clusters in use blah, blah, blah stu