From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jun 25 13:05:29 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B837106567C
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 25 Jun 2012 13:05:29 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.99])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 024DC8FC0A
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 25 Jun 2012 13:05:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5PD5Y5g079080;
	Mon, 25 Jun 2012 15:05:34 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost)
	by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id
	q5PD5Yvq079077; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 15:05:34 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 15:05:34 +0200 (CEST)
From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
To: Vincent Hoffman <vince@unsane.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <4FE8616D.2030002@unsane.co.uk>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206251505320.79051@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
References: <4FCF9333.70201@speakeasy.org>
	<402199FE-380B-41B6-866B-7D5D66C457D5@lpthe.jussieu.fr>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1206191952250.8234@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1206200618290.46371@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
	<26.30.12873.06EE2EF4@smtp02.insight.synacor.com>
	<20120621230302.GB575@hemlock.hydra>
	<loom.20120624T221657-6@post.gmane.org>
	<1340574699711-5721495.post@n5.nabble.com>
	<loom.20120625T143324-756@post.gmane.org>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1206251453070.78793@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
	<4FE8616D.2030002@unsane.co.uk>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7
	(wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]);
	Mon, 25 Jun 2012 15:05:35 +0200 (CEST)
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: CLANG vs GCC tests of fortran/f2c program
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 13:05:29 -0000

>>
>> If it would be truly about removing GPLv3 code that hurts, replacing
>> libstdc++ would be first thing to do.
> I assume you mean like the new libc++?
> http://wiki.freebsd.org/NewC%2B%2BStack

yes. this is actually GREAT MOVE!
even if it's slower, object oriented languages are not about speed anyway.

This should be done first, not compiler.

Compiler - only after actually better would exist.