From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 23 17:49:31 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0800716A4CE for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 17:49:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8395F43D31 for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 17:49:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) id i8NHnTLp058306; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 12:49:29 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 12:49:29 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: Chris Laverdure Message-ID: <20040923174929.GM66118@dan.emsphone.com> References: <1095916547.661.1.camel@elemental.DashEvil> <84dead72040923060647ebea29@mail.gmail.com> <1095956385.661.10.camel@elemental.DashEvil> <1095916547.661.1.camel@elemental.DashEvil> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1095956385.661.10.camel@elemental.DashEvil> <1095916547.661.1.camel@elemental.DashEvil> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.3-BETA4 X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: Joseph Koshy Subject: Re: /usr/sbin/config dependancy check? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 17:49:31 -0000 In the last episode (Sep 23), Chris Laverdure said: > Is there any hope of getting some dependancy checking in config? I > can't imagine it being that difficult to implement and it would clear > up a lot of noise on the mailing lists and IRC channels. > > Plus, well, it just makes sense. In the last episode (Sep 23), Chris Laverdure said: > Alright, here's an example that hit me. > > # /usr/sbin/config CUSTOM > Error: Option DDB requires the following: > Options KDB > # Looks like config has dependency checking after all :) If it didn't, you would likely have gotten a compile or link error when building the kernel. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com