From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Sep 30 1:14:58 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mailhost01.reflexnet.net (mailhost01.reflexnet.net [64.6.192.82]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EC0037B502 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2000 01:14:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 149.211.6.64.reflexcom.com ([64.6.211.149]) by mailhost01.reflexnet.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.197.19); Sat, 30 Sep 2000 01:13:44 -0700 Received: (from cjc@localhost) by 149.211.6.64.reflexcom.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) id e8U8EZD25204; Sat, 30 Sep 2000 01:14:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from cjc) Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2000 01:14:35 -0700 From: "Crist J . Clark" To: James Gorham Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, brennan@offwhite.net Subject: Re: IPFW Addition Message-ID: <20000930011435.B25121@149.211.6.64.reflexcom.com> Reply-To: cjclark@alum.mit.edu References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: ; from james@veldt.com on Fri, Sep 29, 2000 at 06:56:55PM -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Sep 29, 2000 at 06:56:55PM -0600, James Gorham wrote: > Sorry for the additional post, but this has thrown me off a bit, I > noticed it in the dmesg: > IP packet filtering initialized, divert enabled, rule-based > forwarding disabled, default to deny, logging disabled. > > Would the default to deny be the cause of the problem??? What problems? Oh, took me a minute, but I found some other mails that seem to be from you. Hmmm... Your errors really look like those one gets when they don't have ipfw enabled in the kernel. But if you are getting the above message, it definately is. But the default deny is not the problem. What happens when you issue ipfw commands at the command line after boot? -- Crist J. Clark cjclark@alum.mit.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message