From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 2 08:44:27 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B47D416A4CF for ; Tue, 2 Dec 2003 08:44:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from pittgoth.com (14.zlnp1.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.149.111]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C288243F3F for ; Tue, 2 Dec 2003 08:44:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (acs-24-154-239-203.zoominternet.net [24.154.239.203]) by pittgoth.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id hB2GiM6q002391; Tue, 2 Dec 2003 11:44:22 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 11:44:20 -0500 From: Tom Rhodes To: Christian Brueffer Message-Id: <20031202114420.00233193.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20031202162745.GE71732@unixpages.org> References: <3FCBB04F.7070204@potentialtech.com> <20031201221825.GB10158@jenny.daemon.li> <20031202053708.GC71732@unixpages.org> <20031202090021.GA269@jenny.daemon.li> <20031202112217.23a48871.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> <20031202162745.GE71732@unixpages.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.6claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: FreeBSD-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Proposed addition to the mail section of the handbook X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 16:44:27 -0000 On Tue, 02 Dec 2003 17:27:45 +0100 Christian Brueffer wrote: > On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 11:22:17AM -0500, Tom Rhodes wrote: > > On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 10:00:21 +0100 > > Josef El-Rayes wrote: > > > > > Christian Brueffer wrote: > > > > On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 11:18:25PM +0100, Josef El-Rayes wrote: > > > > > > > > line 72: it is "manpage" not "man page". > > > > > > > Actually it is 'manual page'. > > > > > > i prefer too, the expression 'manual page', but as > > > bill used the short form, i just wanted to point out > > > that o'reilly writes it 'manpage' and not 'man page'. > > > > > > (http://www.oreilly.com/oreilly/author/stylesheet.html#M). > > > > It always depends on who you talk to too. Some people say man > > page, some use manual page, some use manpage. Trust me, this > > is a bikeshed you don't want to step into... :) > > > > Of course. What I meant to say was 'manual page is what we usually use > for our documentation' :-) I like manual page as well. This was probably keramida's fault now that I think about it... :P -- Tom Rhodes