From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed May 22 15:18:45 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mail.k12us.com (mail.k12us.com [65.112.222.15]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DA54837B400 for ; Wed, 22 May 2002 15:18:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 6717 invoked by uid 1001); 22 May 2002 22:18:23 -0000 Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 18:18:23 -0400 From: Christopher Weimann To: Andre Oppermann Cc: Terry Lambert , Adrian Filipi-Martin , FreeBSD Hackers List Subject: Re: tuning a CPU bound server Message-ID: <20020522181822.A51741@mail.k12us.com> References: <3CEC0E35.26DBB385@pipeline.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3CEC0E35.26DBB385@pipeline.ch>; from oppermann@pipeline.ch on Wed, May 22, 2002 at 11:31:33PM +0200 X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.1 (http://amavis.org/) Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 11:31:33PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote: > > > > But DJB does't maintain his code. I don't think it he has touched > > it in years. > > He maintains his code quite well. Thing is he only changes something > if there is something to change. In the case of qmail-1.03 this means > no change since 1998. Why? Simply because qmail-1.03 is essentially > bugfree and works perfectly for it's intended purpose. I know because > I spend the last five years writing and maintaining the qmail-ldap > add-on and know the qmail code inside-out. Actually once you get used > to it it's very nice and clean. > Not intended as a slight against DJB ( althought I do realize it looked that way ). I LOVE qmail, look at my headers. But DJB does not introduce any of Terry's "network effects". To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message