From owner-freebsd-current Tue Apr 4 20:50:48 1995 Return-Path: current-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id UAA01722 for current-outgoing; Tue, 4 Apr 1995 20:50:48 -0700 Received: from mail.barrnet.net (mail.BARRNET.NET [131.119.246.7]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id UAA01714 for ; Tue, 4 Apr 1995 20:50:46 -0700 Received: from dataplex.net (SHARK.DATAPLEX.NET [199.183.109.241]) by mail.barrnet.net (8.6.10/MAIL-RELAY-LEN) with ESMTP id UAA21172 for ; Tue, 4 Apr 1995 20:47:39 -0700 Received: from [199.183.109.242] by dataplex.net with SMTP (MailShare 1.0b8); Tue, 4 Apr 1995 22:50:05 -0500 X-Sender: wacky@shark.dataplex.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Tue, 4 Apr 1995 22:50:08 -0500 To: Poul-Henning Kamp From: rkw@dataplex.net (Richard Wackerbarth) Subject: Re: NOTICE: If you care, speak now! Cc: current@FreeBSD.org Sender: current-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Poul-Henning Kamp writes: >nice, but I doubt your timing is good. This seems to be too extensive >for 2.1 at this time. 1) I've been working on this idea for some time. The changes to do a 90% job are really pretty minor. 2) There are no changes to any of the code, just the makefiles and .mk files. Debugging is very simple. -- Either everything compiles or it doesn't. If you have a proper /usr/src and /usr/obj with the "make obj" links installed, you would not notice any difference. 3) This is no more of a change than the changes to "install" that are being so widely advocated. ---- Richard Wackerbarth rkw@dataplex.net