From owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 22 20:45:54 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5B8A1065688; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 20:45:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pz0-f54.google.com (mail-pz0-f54.google.com [209.85.210.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B14708FC0A; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 20:45:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by dadr6 with SMTP id r6so15288dad.13 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 13:45:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Ib3h3fm7ZAUatzyoujXTzkE8AyqexZuqtvEoOmVOT6U=; b=FZzJQ12RmUN6svb6Udg4/vewKoLauvk5QBHvQYoqg/av+KvhPrvDKXrOkr3aCtiTLv 6GosWRid1+NeYcrSP4nHXepdg/DtyRDjrtVtnX5IohgQHbD4UAnqsTZXQRRGhr0STBux L5Nvsd16+32nQM4DipJTn2iZ0MVuyW2COpmvoeOkVf9V6hZa8+Let9d10XXV3i3qRYDq Ya4+0+Q7T8wRKOagmZBYLEdGJVneeRetEBn+6JxEFYjPjbphKWNczO05CdkTIMnNe/XB lRGkrpSBQmxVrqngXFGYSicmD77lxss4jb6tdMmOPmv5CUIWKcI0+4IkB5ZfUT6FWjG7 Fb2Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.66.82.167 with SMTP id j7mr14427878pay.32.1345668353069; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 13:45:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.36.106 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 13:45:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <925895036.20120823003403@serebryakov.spb.ru> References: <1311732708.20120815005429@serebryakov.spb.ru> <925895036.20120823003403@serebryakov.spb.ru> Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 13:45:53 -0700 Message-ID: From: Adrian Chadd To: lev@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New ath code works well as AP X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 20:45:54 -0000 well, the playbook is still a good test. I bet it's exposing shortcomings in our power save handling code. Adrian