From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Mar 29 13:18:32 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id C86EA16A4CE; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 13:18:32 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from smp500.sitetronics.com (sitetronics.com [82.192.77.163])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 4F35143D4C; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 13:18:32 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from dodell@offmyserver.com)
Received: from localhost.sitetronics.com ([127.0.0.1]
	helo=smp500.sitetronics.com)
	by smp500.sitetronics.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
	(Exim 4.50 (FreeBSD))
	id 1DGGaY-0000Dv-CK; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 15:16:58 +0200
Received: (from dodell@localhost)
	by smp500.sitetronics.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id j2TDGv6e000862;
	Tue, 29 Mar 2005 15:16:57 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from dodell@offmyserver.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: smp500.sitetronics.com: dodell set sender to
	dodell@offmyserver.com using -f
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 15:16:57 +0200
From: "Devon H. O'Dell " <dodell@offmyserver.com>
To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, hackers@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20050329131657.GI79414@smp500.sitetronics.com>
Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, hackers@freebsd.org
References: <423C15C5.6040902@fsn.hu>
	<20050327133059.3d68a78c@Magellan.Leidinger.net>
	<20050327134044.GM78512@silverwraith.com>
	<20050327162839.2fafa6aa@Magellan.Leidinger.net>
	<5bbfe7d405032823144fc1af7b@mail.gmail.com>
	<5bbfe7d405032823232103d537@mail.gmail.com>
	<20050329111107.GD69824@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au>
	<20050329131253.GA29144@walton.maths.tcd.ie>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="y9PDtDHaFrXNoMPU"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20050329131253.GA29144@walton.maths.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i
Subject: Re: Fwd: 5-STABLE kernel build with icc broken
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 13:18:32 -0000


--y9PDtDHaFrXNoMPU
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 02:12:53PM +0100, David Malone wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 09:11:07PM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> > That's almost a year ago and specifically for the amd64.  Does anyone
> > know what the results were?
>=20
> I had a quick dig around on cvsweb this morning:
>=20
> 	http://grappa.unix-ag.uni-kl.de/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/sys/i386/i386/bcopy.s=
?cvsroot=3Ddragonfly
>=20
>=20
> I dunno if Matt has benchmarks for before and after.
>=20
> 	David.

I believe it was asserted on the list that the modification
doubled the performance. I have not tested this.

--Devon

--y9PDtDHaFrXNoMPU
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFCSVVJSkf3jVXOdl0RAqqFAJ0XUJklEODt26HckEQXI7MblhBSmgCfVTRl
rU2T1lTvu6CJUUEEpA39qZ0=
=7YtI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--y9PDtDHaFrXNoMPU--