From owner-freebsd-current  Thu Jun 24  6:27:59 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B033814F00
	for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 24 Jun 1999 06:27:42 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no)
Received: (from des@localhost)
	by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.1) id PAA51412;
	Thu, 24 Jun 1999 15:27:06 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from des)
To: Doug <Doug@gorean.org>
Cc: "Brian F. Feldman" <green@unixhelp.org>,
	freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: New ATA stuff, questions and comment
References: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9906231413180.7457-100000@dt054n86.san.rr.com>
From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>
Date: 24 Jun 1999 15:27:05 +0200
In-Reply-To: Doug's message of "Wed, 23 Jun 1999 14:16:23 -0700 (PDT)"
Message-ID: <xzpbte5wwye.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
Lines: 12
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 19.34
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Doug <Doug@gorean.org> writes:
> On Wed, 23 Jun 1999, Brian F. Feldman wrote:
> > A device name isn't necessarily the same as a device node, you know.
> 	Actually I do know that, but I've never come across a situation in
> freebsd where I would call something one thing in my kernel config file
> and something else in /dev.

man bpf

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message