From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 15 18:56:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B71F16A4CE for ; Thu, 15 Jul 2004 18:56:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail6.speakeasy.net (mail6.speakeasy.net [216.254.0.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16F3743D48 for ; Thu, 15 Jul 2004 18:56:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 9835 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2004 18:56:19 -0000 Received: from dsl027-160-063.atl1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO server.baldwin.cx) ([216.27.160.63]) (envelope-sender ) encrypted SMTP for ; 15 Jul 2004 18:56:18 -0000 Received: from 10.50.41.229 (gw1.twc.weather.com [216.133.140.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by server.baldwin.cx (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i6FItFGo083239; Thu, 15 Jul 2004 14:55:15 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) From: John Baldwin To: Alfred Perlstein Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 14:15:02 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.6 References: <20040715050225.GA87532@freefall.freebsd.org> <20040715052941.GL95729@elvis.mu.org> In-Reply-To: <20040715052941.GL95729@elvis.mu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200407151415.03555.jhb@FreeBSD.org> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on server.baldwin.cx cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: Bosko Milekic cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern kern_shutdown.c vfs_subr.c X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 18:56:20 -0000 On Thursday 15 July 2004 01:29 am, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > Also, why do you copy the proc name to the stack lower in > > kern_shutdown.c? Do you fear that the proc might change from > > under you when you're at the bottom and you can't therefore > > only keep a reference to the proc instead? > > Because I don't know if the proc will be there after it nukes itself. They don't nuke themselves, they just go to sleep. A quick look at the code would have revealed this. -- John Baldwin <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.org